There are some differences between being a civil lawyer and a criminal lawyer. A criminal attorney will probably spend a large part of their day in court, while a civil lawyer may spend varying amounts of time in court. A civil litigator may spend a large portion of their day researching legal questions, writing persuasive arguments, preparing for trial, and negotiating settlements.
Although criminal and civil cases often overlap, there are some key differences between the two. One of the main differences is that the burden of proof is much lower in civil cases, where a civil case relies on “Preponderance of the evidence” or “Clear and convincing” evidence. These standards may seem different, but are necessary to get the job done. For example, a criminal defense lawyer will try to poke holes in the credibility of witnesses and evidence in order to create reasonable doubt among jurors. Because of this, attorneys approach their cases differently.
Criminal law involves breaking the law. In addition to individual arrests, it can also apply to businesses and organizations. Oftentimes, it involves government charges. In either case, the role of a criminal lawyer requires strong analytical and research skills. And unlike civil lawyers, criminal lawyers also handle complex information and situations. In either case, they are battling for justice for their clients.